Bank Teller loses twins at bank robbery....Even the Pro-Choicers are angry!!!

Before I begin, let me say that what happened with Katherin Shuffield is a tradgedy and I cannot possibly know how she feels. The following is not meant to bring scorn or mockery on her or her family. She is in my prayers...

As many have heard Katherin Shuffield was a bank teller in Indianapolis workin diligently when she became victim to a bank robbery, she was shot and as a result her twins which were growing inside of her were killed. Many people are shocked, it's on all of the news channels. There is a baby killer on the loose.

But why is this such a tragedy?

If babies inside the womb are nothing more then fetal tissue why is it so devastating to hear that they died? Was it because of how they died? Was a gun shot not medicinal or sanitary enough?

According to the Pro-Murder movement the shock we feel is not a result of the babies who were killed, after all that was not life that was killed, nearly 'cells' that ceased to replicate...

Or was the tragedy of this situation that the mother did not want to exterminate her children, by her own free will and was deprived of choice?

Tell that to the mother of the children who were killed, tell that to Katherin Shuffield who's can no longer feel her twins kick anymore. There was life inside of her. Whether or not they were killed by vacuum cleaners, or a gun...her babies died.

Which brings me to a T-Shirt.

Abort73 has these amazing shirts. They were made BEFORE this robbery, and I hope to be able to get one.

Behold the "Will it bother you us more if they used Guns" shirt...

Yes. Of course it will bother you, unless you are somehow inhuman or a mass serial killer.

Because life is killed. It's a tradgedy. The fact that we allow it in our country, the fact that they are as common if not more then Plastic Surgeries, is a stain on this country and cannot possible be reasoned.

This proves there is no rational argument for the Pro-Choicer. None.

Baby Wooly Mammoth, Fully Perserved...Drowned.

It never ceases to amaze me. Everyday we discover more and more about our world, and with every discovery we find more and more proof for a biblical creation.

Read the full article here.

"Russian scientists say they have obtained the most detailed pictures so far of the insides of a prehistoric animal, with the help of a baby mammoth called Lyuba found immaculately preserved in the Russian Arctic."

Below is the real kicker...

"The scans showed her airways and digestive system were clogged with what scientists believe was silt, leading them to conclude that she must have drowned."

Really? What could have caused her to drown? I don't know a Flood or something? No...

The article then goes on to violate the law of non-contradiction by stating two completely different ages for the animal...

The caption under the picture states...

"A remarkably well-preserved baby mammoth — at least 10,000 years old — discovered recently in Siberia."

"Tests on Lyuba showed she was fed on milk and was three to four months old when she died 37,000 years ago in what is now the Yamalo-Nenetsk region in Russia's Arctic."

This leads me to conclude the obvious, they never dated the thing using any method, they found a wooly mammoth and assumed the age...No surprises here. I mean really what's a 27,000 year difference in opinion?

and I told myself I was going to be a Blog Free weekend...

Comment Below.