If Ben Stein is not a scientist then...

I think this says it all.

Ben Stein is Expelled...Literally.

With all the hype surrounding Ben Stein's movie, "Expelled" there is also a lot of anger and hostility towards the man for making a documentary. So much so it proves the very premise of his very own movie.

Over the past few weeks, evolutionist have attacked, mocked, ridiculed, and buried anything that has anything to do with Ben Stein's documentary so much so it is impossible to find any information in support of the movie on Digg.

Were not talking about nice professsional rebuttals of the movie. Were talking about flat out angry hostilities, swearing and name calling. Very scientific approaches.

This leads me to conclude without even seeing the movie that Ben Stein was correct.

The truth is that right now Ben Stein could not possibly get a job in any scientific environment because he sides on Intelligent Design and because of this, his movie could have been blank, with three words that said "Evolution is Fake" for an hour and half and the same sort of sentiment would have arisen.

So my question for all the evolutionist is why the hostility? Why is there such an anger to defend evolution? Why must it be done with such hostile attitudes as opposed to professional academic behavior and discussion?

The creationist are Fox News and the evolutionist are the loons at the Daily Kos.

Can't we all be sensible?

To Ben Stein, congratulations on this amazing social experiment. You sir, are awesome.

You proved your point, before the movie even came out.

Baby Wooly Mammoth, Fully Perserved...Drowned.

It never ceases to amaze me. Everyday we discover more and more about our world, and with every discovery we find more and more proof for a biblical creation.

Read the full article here.

"Russian scientists say they have obtained the most detailed pictures so far of the insides of a prehistoric animal, with the help of a baby mammoth called Lyuba found immaculately preserved in the Russian Arctic."

Below is the real kicker...

"The scans showed her airways and digestive system were clogged with what scientists believe was silt, leading them to conclude that she must have drowned."

Really? What could have caused her to drown? I don't know a Flood or something? No...

The article then goes on to violate the law of non-contradiction by stating two completely different ages for the animal...

The caption under the picture states...

"A remarkably well-preserved baby mammoth — at least 10,000 years old — discovered recently in Siberia."

"Tests on Lyuba showed she was fed on milk and was three to four months old when she died 37,000 years ago in what is now the Yamalo-Nenetsk region in Russia's Arctic."

This leads me to conclude the obvious, they never dated the thing using any method, they found a wooly mammoth and assumed the age...No surprises here. I mean really what's a 27,000 year difference in opinion?

and I told myself I was going to be a Blog Free weekend...

Comment Below.